I'm waiting for Carmack to adopt D already. Barring some
implementation details (GC issues, shared libraries, bla bla)
it's pretty much the perfect language for what he wants to do.
(Fast and functional in parts.) Plus, if anyone could work around
issues or figure out how to do really cool things with D, it
would be Carmack.
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance qznc
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance H. S. Teoh
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance Paulo Pinto
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance Froglegs
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performan... Paulo Pinto
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Klaim - Joël Lamotte
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Paulo Pinto
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Klaim - Joël Lamotte
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance bearophile
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performan... Paulo Pinto
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... w0rp
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Dicebot
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Suliman
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Dicebot
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Joseph Rushton Wakeling
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... deadalnix
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Joseph Rushton Wakeling
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... deadalnix
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse perfo... Paulo Pinto
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance Brad Anderson
- Re: John Carmack on Eclipse performance Ziad Hatahet
