On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 at 12:27:56 UTC, Suliman wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 at 12:14:31 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On Tuesday, 1 October 2013 at 12:02:29 UTC, w0rp wrote:
I'm waiting for Carmack to adopt D already. Barring some
implementation details (GC issues, shared libraries, bla bla)
it's pretty much the perfect language for what he wants to
do. (Fast and functional in parts.) Plus, if anyone could
work around issues or figure out how to do really cool things
with D, it would be Carmack.
He is familiar with D and has shown appreciation for D `pure`
functions in his twitter posts.
Link to post? Sorry, but what does 'pure' mean in this content?
Does it's mean good or bad?
https://twitter.com/ID_AA_Carmack/status/173111220092682240
http://dlang.org/function.html#pure-functions
