On Thursday, October 24, 2013 21:07:16 deadalnix wrote: > On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 18:22:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis > > wrote: > > Agreed. But there's a significant difference between @system > > and illegal, and > > deadalnix was claiming that such init values were illegal per > > the language > > spec, which is what I was objecting to. > > > > - Jonathan M Davis > > I never claimed that. I claimed that the init value, whatever it > is, must be considered as valid. This is only loosly coupled with > void as init value.
Then what do you mean by valid? - Jonathan M Davis
