On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 20:04:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
On Thursday, October 24, 2013 21:07:16 deadalnix wrote:
On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 18:22:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> Agreed. But there's a significant difference between @system
> and illegal, and
> deadalnix was claiming that such init values were illegal per
> the language
> spec, which is what I was objecting to.
>
> - Jonathan M Davis
I never claimed that. I claimed that the init value, whatever
it
is, must be considered as valid. This is only loosly coupled
with
void as init value.
Then what do you mean by valid?
Code operating on the struct must handle that case. It is a valid
state for the struct to be in.
