Am Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:58:38 +0100 schrieb "logicchains" <[email protected]>:
> That's interesting. Is there a particular reason for using size_t > for array indexing rather than int? It is the natural representation of an array index. It is unsigned and spans the whole addressable memory area. The _t indicates that its size depends on the target architecture. -- Marco
