On 08/11/13 04:13, logicchains wrote:
Benchmark author here. I left the ldmd2 entry there to represent the performance of the D implementation from the time of the benchmark, to highlight that the current D implementation is much newer than the others, and that there have been no attempts to optimise the C and C++ versions similarly to how the latest D version was optimised. If you feel it creates needless confusion I can remove it, however, or put a note next to it stating the above.
Seems fine to me to compare two different code implementations, but displaying things as you have suggests this is a compiler difference. For proper comparison, you should probably compile both codes with ldc2 and the same optimizations, and see how they compare.
