On 10/11/13 05:31, logicchains wrote:
The former produces better random numbers, but it's possible that it may be slower.
Ahh, makes sense. Where did you get the particular RNG you used? I don't recognize it.
On 10/11/13 05:31, logicchains wrote:
The former produces better random numbers, but it's possible that it may be slower.
Ahh, makes sense. Where did you get the particular RNG you used? I don't recognize it.