Re: Review of std.signal

[Robert]

On Sunday, 10 November 2013 at 10:37:41 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2013-11-09 23:50, Robert wrote:
1
Nice. But you trade it for protection having a default value, 
making the
syntax more verbose in the general case.

You can overload it:

template signal (string name, Args...)


Smartass! ;-) Of course this would work, not bad! I am not sure 
whether this additional wrapper it is worth its salt, but it is 
definitely a nice alternative. I will absolutely think about it. 
Thanks!