On 11/14/13, 8:40 AM, Robert wrote:
* Isn't it better to use an enum for the protection attributes?

Having put some thought into this, while it seems to be, I think it isn't.
Enums in D are scoped, so for the enum:

enum Protection { protected_, private_, none }


Enums in D may be scoped. There is nothing that prevents you from declaring your enum thus:

enum { protected_, private_, none }

making the shorter version perfectly legal.

mixin(signal!(string, int)("valueChanged", protected_));

Your concern about extra typing by always needing to specify the scope is thus unwarranted.

Reply via email to