On 11/18/2013 11:44 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Here, again, we have a nothrow constructor call a more general one, which may throw in general. The intent - maximizing internal reuse through forwarding - is noble. The realization - it takes more code to reuse than to just set the blessed variables - is a corruption of the noble goal.
I also have a design issue with having throwing constructors at all. I know D allows them, but I consider it a bad practice.
