On 11/20/13 4:03 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 at 23:57:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
No, because the quantity being measured is "worse".
Andrei
If it would have been an inherent well-defined trait of an object
itself, it would have been objective comparison. As this quantity is
defined purely (and no real measurable traits other than consistency
were proposed) by observing subject, it can't be an objective
measurement and this objective comparison.
In this context "objectively worse" means "all reasonable people would
say it's worse".
Andrei
