On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 at 23:57:40 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 11/20/13 3:45 PM, Dicebot wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 November 2013 at 20:47:10 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
There are a bunch of styles that are consistent yet used by nobody, because they are objectively worse. So consistency is not the sole requirement. Then you hadn't mentioned "that is liked by at least one programmer" which moves the goalposts. Then one programmer can be one
highly unusual human being, so there is strength in numbers.

You see, the whole definition of term "objective comparison" implies
comparison by  traits other than actual usage.

No, because the quantity being measured is "worse".

Andrei

Ho please, we aren't in a schoolyard.

Reply via email to