On 21 November 2013 13:27, Adam D. Ruppe <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 November 2013 at 03:14:30 UTC, Manu wrote: > >> I personally think () should not be optional >> > > No. How is it ever an advantage to syntactically allow visual confusion between a function call and a variable? Then we have this confusing situation: >> myProperty(); // am I calling the property, or am I calling the >> function the property returns? >> > > Yes, this case is the whole reason @property was added in the first place! > How many years has it been now with the half-assed implementation? > > We can and should fix this without any other arguments about optional > parenthesis. >
