On 11/20/2013 7:14 PM, Manu wrote:
It would be nice to have a commitment on @property. Currently, () is optional on all functions, and @property means nothing. I personally think () should not be optional, and @property should require that () is not present (ie, @property has meaning).
The next release is going to be about bug fixes, not introducing regressions from new features(!). It's a short release cycle, anyway.
