On Wednesday, 25 December 2013 at 10:58:53 UTC, bearophile wrote:
Probably directly addressed by issue 10762:
[snip]
But if you rewrite iota() also take in account the following:
[snip again]
An important enhancement:
Optional "[]" syntax for std.range.iota too
Wow! That's a lot of stuff needing work. Now I understand why
some people were waiting for a better iota :D
Everything seems reasonable, and the "[]" syntax could be a nice
addition, too.
Shouldn't be that much difficult.
(A less important enhancement is issue 11252).
On the other hand, I have honestly no idea whatsoever about how
to implement this
Bye,
bearophile
I will probably start working a bit tomorrow, and I guess I will
leave the current float specialization untouched, at least at the
beginning. In the mean time, merry Christmas to everyone!
