On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 10:39:08 -0800, David Gileadi <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 1/8/14, 11:28 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
I've been looking at AGG, and to me the biggest problem is the license.
It would it difficult to use in commercial scenarios that D itself is
perfectly safe in. As useful as the GPL is, I don't think it belongs in
a library project.
I think if you're willing to use version 2.4 then you get a much more
permissive license, no? That's how I read
http://www.antigrain.com/license/index.html anyway...
Right, it will just force us to become responsible for maintaining our own
fork of AGG. I'm not sure we should get into that business.
--
Adam Wilson
IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator
