On Wednesday, 8 January 2014 at 19:51:31 UTC, Adam Wilson wrote:
Small meeting size probably also has to be with when and where
the meeting was. Beyond that, all I can say is that not being
part of standard is freeing in certain respects. Namely the
Yes, and also that they are less likely to invent something new,
but will be told to just making existing practice formal.
Some discussions are worth looking at though. Like this
discussion of pixel coordinates:
https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/graphics/ZEIOhsJrrUQ
Personally, I think that allowing multiple graphics contexts to
the same surface is the better approach, so that you can scale it
to either be in the range ([0,1],[0,1]), ([-1,1],[-1,1]),
([0,width],[0,height]), etc
e.g.:
g = surface.getContext().resetScaleNormalizedCenter(); //
normalized to [-1,1]
gwh = surface.getContext().resetScaleWidthHeight(); // vertices
in pixel coordinates
gretina = gwh.clone().scale(2,2); // vertices in points
coordinates
g.plot(-1,-1); //upper left corner
gwh.plot(0,0); //upper left corner
etc.
