On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 18:48:15 UTC, Maxim Fomin wrote:
On Saturday, 11 January 2014 at 18:43:39 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
I don't know about the details of what is/isn't legal here,
but the only reason the compiler accepts it is because
filename is marked as pure.
It is legal exactly because function is marked as pure. Result
of pure function is implicitly convertible to immutable.
I had heard this mentioned before; is it true in all cases?
Even when the function returns a reference to external data?
