On 1/12/14 12:35 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 01/12/2014 07:10 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 1/12/14 8:46 AM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Yep. Has this been placed in bugzilla? It's rather hi-pri.
If this isn't https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11503 - it
most likely has the same cause.
Put $150 on this.
https://www.bountysource.com/issues/1325974-type-system-breaking-caused-by-implicit-conversion-for-the-value-returned-from-pure-function
Andrei
This issue was trivial, and yet was assigned a higher bounty than e.g.
fixing CTFE performance, which requires a large investment as far as I
understand. This raises the question of how bountied issues are
selected.
I select them with a focus on impact. Clearly the process could be
improved.
There are other serious problems with the type system
implementation, eg:
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9149
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10376
https://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Thanks, will take those under advisement. FWIW there's been a thread
taking suggestions.
On a related note, I think it makes no sense to put a bounty on the
"Object not const-correct" issue. What would someone be required to do
in order to get the bounty for that issue?
Make sure we have a complete solution for invoking Object's methods
against const and immutable Objects?
Andrei
