On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:49:49PM +0100, Tom S wrote: > Why is dedicated syntax for comma expressions better than commaExpr(...)?
What do you propose we do about the commas in loops? Breaking them would be a pretty big change to the C folks. With the naked comma tuple, how do you pass them to a function? void func(Tuple!(int, int) a, int b); Is that just the same as: void func(int a, int b, int c); You'd call them the same way without the tuple decoration :S It might be my years of C bias, but the naked tuples just look wrong. -- Adam D. Ruppe http://arsdnet.net
