Adam D. Ruppe wrote: > By keeping the tuple word there, it is no longer conflicting with my C > expectations, but seems to be just as useful as your proposal.
Hm. Then I believe you haven't read the whole thing. (That's ok, it does go on for a while.) Yes, much of the appeal is in the shorter syntax. But some of the features proposed even require that no 'tuple' keyword is used. Looking like C is not the be-all and end-all of programming languages. Mist tries to follow mathematical notation wherever possible. This has had other implications, like using <- for assignment and = for equality. -- Michiel Helvensteijn
