On 11/02/14 22:12, Frank Bauer wrote:
Excellent idea. All the cries (including mine) for a non-GC D would stop at once.
I hope so, but I doubt it. Instead the criticisms will start focusing on the lack of library functionality and the potential for a Phobos/Tango style split between regular D and the minimal non-GC D.
That's not however a reason to not go forward with this.
