Manu <[email protected]> writes: > I don't actually think this is what the 'no GC' crowd want. C++ programmers > will not be satisfied with this. They'll see it as a step backwards towards C, > not forwards.
I have to agree with this. I was attracted to D by the better C++ possibilities. I still want that. And I would like to see the gc be as performant as possible, and be relatively easy to avoid in bottlenecks. I don't work on real time systems, but throughput and not hammering the memory bus matters a lot. Jerry
