On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:11:13 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Historically 2 approaches has been practiced:1) argue a lot and then do nothing 2) suddenly change something and tell users is was necessary
These are one and the same, just from the two opposing points of view.
I also think that this is much more important issue than this whole thread but it does not seem to attract any real attention when mentioned.
You mean the whole policy on breaking changes?
