On Monday, 10 March 2014 at 14:42:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
Yes. I have given up about this idea at some point as there seemed to be consensus that no breaking changes will be even considered for D2 and those that come from fixing bugs are not worth the fuss.
So at what point are we going to discuss these things in the context of D-next? These topics have us group up and focus on compromises instead of ideals. As was said, D2 is at the 90% point. It only has room left for bug fixes. I think we would make much more productive use of our time and minds coming up with ideas that actually have a chance of coming to fruition, even if D3 ends up being half a decade away.
