On 3/16/14, 3:47 PM, David Eagen wrote:
I've started using it in a project to replace a simple dynamic array
buffer and so far it has fit my needs very well. One thing I ran into
was a method in the project's API that has this signature:
const(ubyte[]) foo() const
I couldn't return a slice from ScopeBuffer directly because of the
const. I resolved it by changing opSlice's signature in ScopeBuffer to
this:
@system inout(T[]) opSlice() inout
So there are two questions:
1.) Is this a good way to resolve the problem or am I doing something
horribly wrong?
2.) Assuming this isn't horribly wrong should ScopeBuffer use inout like
this?
good way, it should -- Andrei
