On 3/17/2014 12:03 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
So yes, it compiles, but the implementation is still wrong. Your implementation allows assigning an immutable(int)* into an int*.Unless there is a performance specific reason for using the const, I don't see why we aren't removing it.
The reason was I was alternately calling put() with mutable char[] and immutable strings. I should look and see if there's a better way.
