Am Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:06:44 +0000 schrieb "Dicebot" <[email protected]>:
> On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 at 15:58:43 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu > wrote: > > Who'd be confused? > > > > Andrei > > Users who see find it in Phobos will be confused about how > experimental exactly it is and what to expect from it. Developers > will be confused about what is expected from them > maintenance-wise starting from this point and what to do with > reported bugs / issues. Why was that never a problem for OpenGL ? > Don't put stuff which is naturally bleeding edge into scheduled > controlled distributions. dub has special category for Phobos > proposals, we need to better popularize it. That much is true. Last time I checked it wasn't there. Then again everyone can add categories there. I added two myself. Everyone can tag their package as Phobos candidate. But I cannot imagine random packages on dub getting the same exposure as modules included in Phobos. They will be auto-tested, the idea has the approval of the community and they are ready to use when you install the compiler. Personally I avoid dub, so to that end I'm probably biased. -- Marco
