On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 11:43:36 UTC, ed wrote:
On Thursday, 27 March 2014 at 11:32:45 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 March 2014 at 16:21:01 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
What we're proposing is to get rid of things like this:
int x = 1, 5; // hands up, how many understand what this
does?
This proposal gets rid of this while keeping the comma
operator.
+1 to dropping to comma operator.
This is what I would like to see illegal, forcing a refactor of
code:
if (((vertex= null), same.vertices)) for (blah){}
Every time it catches me out and I misread the code to be:
if(vertex == null && same.vertices) for (blah) {}
Cheers,
ed
s/== null/is null/
