On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 05:37:50 -0400, Sjoerd van Leent wrote: > It appears that there are really different discussions about properties. > There is a discussion about letting properties look and act as much as > fields, and there is a discussion about calling member methods on > returning structs. > > I'd like to seperate these discussions. First, I don't think it is wise > to call a member on a returning struct, because of the expectation that > the underlying object knows about the change. Thus is not true for a > struct.
Sounds to me like you missed the beginning of the discussion: http://www.digitalmars.com/webnews/newsgroups.php? art_group=digitalmars.D&article_id=94225
