On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 16:25:10 UTC, Aleksandar Ruzicic wrote:
On Friday, 18 April 2014 at 15:30:52 UTC, David Gileadi wrote:

As the guy who was mostly responsible for the current look and feel of the website I can provide some insight into the effort required. The website is built using DDoc[1], and anyone who wants to change the look and feel will need to learn it. It's not difficult. It does mean that the site is static HTML, so any dynamism needs to be JS-only (and I think any efforts to make the pages largely JS-driven would meet resistance).

I know about DDoc usage, I already know it and using it, so that wouldn't be the issue. Regarding the dynamism, I would definitely go with some JavaScript for the search feature (I want to provide real-time filtering/suggestions something like DevDocs[1]) but I would make it optional (so that search is still usable with JS disabled/unavailable).

Phew...you narrowly avoided a Nick/Teoh JS rant there :P.

Also note that there's a movement to make at least part of the website (the Phobos docs) use a different documentation generator, so the new look would need to be ported to that too. I suspect that wouldn't be hard.

I wasn't aware of that, do you by any chance have links to those threads?


Here's one (they are kind of hard to Google now that the preview is up on the site and "ddox" appears on every page):
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/[email protected]

Reply via email to