On 2014-04-30 23:25, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Sure, that helps, but it's trivial to write a unittest block which depends on a previous unittest block
There for the tests should be run in random order. -- /Jacob Carlborg
Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d Thu, 01 May 2014 04:06:07 -0700
On 2014-04-30 23:25, Jonathan M Davis via Digitalmars-d wrote:
Sure, that helps, but it's trivial to write a unittest block which depends on a previous unittest block
There for the tests should be run in random order. -- /Jacob Carlborg