On 5/1/14, 4:44 AM, w0rp wrote:
On Thursday, 1 May 2014 at 11:05:55 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2014-04-30 23:35, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Agreed. I think we should look into parallelizing all unittests. --
Andrei
I recommend running the tests in random order as well.
This is a bad idea. Tests could fail only some of the time. Even if bugs
are missed, I would prefer it if tests did exactly the same thing every
time.
I do random testing all the time, and I print the seed of the prng upon
startup. When something fails randomly, I take the seed and seed the
prng with it to reproduce. -- Andrei
