On 5/4/2014 3:26 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 04/05/14 20:56, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
So I think it's probably safe to figure this is a uniform distribution
unless
some expert chimes in and says otherwise.
Thanks for the help.
You're very welcome. Keep me posted on how things go with your
implementation! :-)
Will do. Speaking of, this algo uses SHA-1 and SHA-2 (depending on the
desired crypto strength of the psuedo-randomness). SHA-1 of course has
been in Phobos for awhile. I've recently expanded it to support SHA-2,
pending sufficient Phobos pull code reviews:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2129
