On 5/24/2014 5:19 PM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On 24/05/14 19:46, Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d wrote:
An initial PR for Hash_DRBG being struct-based and directly part of
"std.random"
I think that's up to you. I don't want to hold you back here, but
equally, I feel that crypto functionality probably should be prototyped
in an experimental module before being finalized in the standard library.
Perhaps. In any case, I've tossed up a PR for it (it contains a few
changes since the latest DAuth version of it). Further HashDRBG
discussion should probably go there:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2208
"Destroy"
It's something that's too important to get right (and properly reviewed).
