On Thursday, 8 May 2014 at 18:29:45 UTC, Jesse Phillips wrote:
This statement doesn't sound like the "no generics" is the
important part. It seems more like they have no plans to make
Go 2.0, at least not with it bringing big breaking changes as
people keep pointing out will happen.
But that is probably reading too much into it, I can't imagine
he wanted to put that much information in the statement. But
then again I haven't seen any official word on Go 2.0 (similar
to D3).
Ah, well context around it removes all my claims. It is clear he
is saying that Go 1.x will not have generics.
