On Friday, 9 May 2014 at 05:22:36 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 19:37 +0000, Jesse Phillips via
Digitalmars-d
wrote:
[…]
Ah, well context around it removes all my claims. It is clear
he is saying that Go 1.x will not have generics.
Given the statements about backward compatibility there is no
way Go 1.x
can have generics. I'm fairly sure the core Go team are
convinced the
interface way and manual "overloading" is the way to go, and
that
generics are an unnecessary burden. Many people argue they are
wrong
without actually trying the style of programming inherent in the
language.
You mean programming in
- Turbo Pascal with object as root
- Oberon with object as root
- Smalltalk with object as root
- Modula-3 with ROOTANY as root
- C++ without templates
- Java with object as root
- C# with object as root
Me, I know what it means.
--
Paulo
