On Wed, 28 May 2014 17:20:22 +0000
TheFlyingFiddle via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> If i am not mistaken, parts of std.benchmark moved into
> std.datetime. After this work on std.benchmark stopped.
You're mistaken. Those were always in std.datetime. Rather, they were moving
into std.benchmark (which is arguably a better place for them). And I expect
that they well be moved into std.benchmark at some point in the future, but
std.benchmark ran into some difficult technical problems that have yet to be
sorted out (hence why it hasn't been completed yet).
I talked with Andrei brielfy about it at dconf (because I want to move those
functions out of std.datetime), and he's interesting in finishing it, but
those technical issues need to be sorted out first.
- Jonathan M Davis
TheFlyingFiddle via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote:
> If i am not mistaken, parts of std.benchmark moved into
> std.datetime. After this work on std.benchmark stopped.
You're mistaken. Those were always in std.datetime. Rather, they were moving
into std.benchmark (which is arguably a better place for them). And I expect
that they well be moved into std.benchmark at some point in the future, but
std.benchmark ran into some difficult technical problems that have yet to be
sorted out (hence why it hasn't been completed yet).
I talked with Andrei brielfy about it at dconf (because I want to move those
functions out of std.datetime), and he's interesting in finishing it, but
those technical issues need to be sorted out first.
- Jonathan M Davis
