On Thu, 2014-05-29 at 22:07 -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d wrote: […] > It was a solid review cycle that prompted good things to fix and > improve. std.benchmark will be part of std iff we make it so. -- Andrei
Clearly the data about the things is in the email thread, but might it be worth creating a summary document so there is a definitive "todo list"? There is then also the issue of: 1. Completing the todo list for a new review for entry into Phobos; versus 2. Extending the framework to handle multiple runs, and statistics on the dataset. Should these be seen as in competition (so that all work on 2 should happen in a separate branch to that on 1), or whether 2 should be seen as contributing to 1. No problems with either direction, but it is probably a good idea to take a view on this early. -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:[email protected] 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: [email protected] London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
