Re: shorter alternative of constructor with parameter

[Xinok via Digitalmars-d]

On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 18:57:25 UTC, Suliman wrote:
and save syntactic sugar for more useful features.
How not implementing this future will help to save syntactic 
sugar?

I mean to use syntactic sugar sparingly, not for minor features 
like this. The trouble is that it makes code non-verbose, which 
would make D code more difficult to read for those unfamiliar 
with the language.