On Saturday, 21 June 2014 at 18:57:25 UTC, Suliman wrote:
How not implementing this future will help to save syntactic sugar?and save syntactic sugar for more useful features.
There is a limited amount of non-widespread syntax sugar you can fit into language without harming its learning curve. By spending it on features that don't make big difference you make language over-saturated by the time something really important becomes necessary.
