On 6/24/14, 4:41 PM, Xinok wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 22:09:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 6/24/14, 11:50 AM, Xinok wrote:
[snip]
See also https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12987. Thanks! --
Andrei
Given that's a breaking change, I'd rather leave it open to discussion
for a while. It would be really bad to silently change its behavior
without so much as a deprecation warning. For now, I'll work on
implementing deterministic & stable topN.
I think the breakage brought about from changing return types from void
to something else is acceptable. -- Andrei
