On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 00:50:48 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/24/14, 4:41 PM, Xinok wrote:
On Tuesday, 24 June 2014 at 22:09:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 6/24/14, 11:50 AM, Xinok wrote:
[snip]
See also https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12987.
Thanks! --
Andrei
Given that's a breaking change, I'd rather leave it open to
discussion
for a while. It would be really bad to silently change its
behavior
without so much as a deprecation warning. For now, I'll work on
implementing deterministic & stable topN.
I think the breakage brought about from changing return types
from void to something else is acceptable. -- Andrei
Agreed. Let's add that.
David
