On Thursday, June 26, 2014 17:45:23 Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote: > On Thursday, 26 June 2014 at 17:26:02 UTC, bearophile wrote: > > Meta: > >> There has been discussion before about doing away with string > >> lambdas. Maybe this is a good time to do that. > > > > If they get deprecated I will have to manually fix a _ton_ of > > code :-) > > > > Bye, > > bearophile > > I guess instead of deprecate, I guess I really mean just "phase > out". Undocument these templates and discourage their use, but > don't actually deprecate them.
The major problem that still needs to be fixed with non-string lambdas is the ability to compare them. Right now, as I understand it, the same non-string lambda doesn't even result in the same template instantiation. String lambdas don't have that problem. - Jonathan M Davis
