On 3 Jul 2014 01:50, "Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d" < [email protected]> wrote: > > On 7/2/2014 2:28 PM, Iain Buclaw via Digitalmars-d wrote: >> >> On 2 July 2014 19:58, via Digitalmars-d <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I don't really understand the reasoning here. Is D Intel x86 specific? >> >> Yes it is, more than you might realise. I've been spending the last 4 >> >> years breaking it to be platform agnostic. :o) > > > I think you're conflating dmd with D. >
I suppose I am just a bit. At the time I was thinking about the spec on _argptr (which has been fixed), __simd and intrinsics.
