On Thursday, 17 July 2014 at 09:20:36 UTC, Russel Winder via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
It appears still to be a general meme that performance required
no GC
and GC mean poor performance. The debate has been restarted on
the Go
mailing list under the banner "go without garbage collector".
The
response to will Go remove the garbage collector was somewhat
unequivocal: nope.
GC or no GC is that the right question ?
The quality of GC implementation is probably more important.
"Simpler and faster GC for Go"
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1v4Oqa0WwHunqlb8C3ObL_uNQw3DfSY-ztoA-4wWbKcg/pub
Another point that will be ignored in such debates is that GC
gives solution for only one problem, memory management.
How about other resources, how to manage them ?
