On Sunday, 20 July 2014 at 11:44:56 UTC, Mike wrote:
Being able to specify an alternate memory manager at compile-time, link-time and/or runtime would be most advantageous, and probably put an end to the GC-phobia.
AFAIK, GC is not directly referenced in druntime, so you already should be able to link with different GC implementation. If you provide all symbols requested by the code, the linker won't link default GC module.
