Re: DIP62: Volatile type qualifier for unoptimizable variables in embedded programming

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d]

On 7/18/2014 4:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:
On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
That doesn't change the heavy effort in the semantic front end

What does this mean in detail? Is it just about the unfortunate AST
representation chosen or are there more sources of heavy effort in the front 
end?

Again, take a look at the hundreds of references to volatile all through the C++ 
specification for some idea.