Re: DIP62: Volatile type qualifier for unoptimizable variables in embedded programming

[Timon Gehr via Digitalmars-d]

On 07/19/2014 02:07 AM, Walter Bright wrote:

On 7/18/2014 4:58 PM, Timon Gehr wrote:

On 07/18/2014 08:37 PM, Walter Bright wrote:

That doesn't change the heavy effort in the semantic front end

What does this mean in detail? Is it just about the unfortunate AST
representation chosen or are there more sources of heavy effort in the
front end?

Again, take a look at the hundreds of references to volatile all through
the C++ specification for some idea.

I am not suggesting to do what C++ does.