On Tuesday, 29 July 2014 at 05:11:33 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
(sorry for being a bit late, was distracted)
std.logger proposal by Robert Schadek enters voting period
which will last two weeks starting from now.
Discussion thread :
http://forum.dlang.org/post/[email protected]
This voting will be somewhat different from previous ones
because it will be done with std.experimental in mind. Because
of that please reply with a bit more structured votes:
1) Yes / No for inclusion into std.experimental
Yes.
At this point please consider if module has functionality you
want to see in standard library in general and if
implementation is not fundamentally broken. This is a simple
sanity check.
2) Yes / No for inclusion into Phobos in its current state
Yes. A lot of reusable components need warnings (hence: logging).
This is where you should summarize your concerns raised during
review if there are any and make decision if existing API /
architecture are promising enough to be set in stone via Phobos
inclusion.
3) If you have answered "No" for (2) : list of mandatory
changes that are needed to make you vote "Yes"
4) Any additional comments for author.
Thanks.
